A comparison of mesophilic composting and unamended land treatment for the bioremediation of aged tar residues in soil

Abstract

AbstractA field study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of land treatment and mesophilic composting in removing aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from soil. The soil composting treatment, which had 20 percent (w/w) fresh organic matter incorporated into the soil, reached mesophilic temperatures of 45 to 50°C at week 3–4 and was effective in reducing PAH from 2240 mg/kg to 120 mg/kg after 224 days of treatment. Conventional land treatment with and without added cow manure (5 percent w/w) was less effective in removing the PAH from the soil than was the mesophilic soil composting treatment. In a parallel laboratory trial, PAH concentrations were reduced below 500 mg/kg (the target cleanup concentration for the site) when the contaminated soil was amended with 20 to 30 percent (w/w) fresh organic matter after 186 days of treatment. PAH degradation was lower in the laboratory trial compared with the field trial and no self‐heating of soil was demonstrated in the laboratory. Based on the relatively high total heterotrophic and naphthalene‐degrading microbial populations in the nonsterile treatments, it was apparent that the absence of microorganisms was unlikely to have limited the biodegradation of PAH in the current study. Fresh organic matter amendments of green tree waste and cow manure, regular mixing of the compost, and maintenance of moisture by regular watering were critical factors in achieving the target PAH concentrations.