Abstract

Although elderly patients with asthma have clinical characteristics different from those of young adults, few studies or guidelines have focused on specific treatments for this population. This study compared the effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) versus inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in elderly patients with asthma in real-world settings. We extracted records for elderly patients with asthma who were newly prescribed LTRAs or low-dose ICSs from January 2003 to December 2010 from National Sample Cohort data of Korea. We defined the first prescription date for each medication as the index date. We compared the risks of asthma exacerbation between the 2 groups using Cox proportional-hazard regression after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance covariates between treatment groups. We also compared asthma-related health care resource utilization and medication compliance in both groups using chi-square test and t test. The number of identified patients newly treated with LTRAs and low-dose ICSs was 1571 and 121, respectively. The risks of asthma exacerbation in the LTRA and low-dose ICS groups after weighting were not significantly different (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.65-1.54). The proportion with high compliance (medication possession ratio ≥80%) in the LTRA group was higher than that in the low-dose ICS group. The effectiveness of LTRAs was not different from that of low-dose ICSs regarding the risk of asthma exacerbation in elderly patients with asthma in real-world settings. Given the practical benefits gained from convenient administration, LTRAs can be considered a reasonable alternative first-line therapy for elderly patients with mild asthma.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call