Abstract

Background: Inguinal hernia, is undoubtedly the commonest type of hernia and has got a significant burden of morbidity and mortality posed by its symptoms and complications, especially if left untreated. Mesh hernioplasty is its well established cure commonly done by open method (Lichtenstein) and less so by laparoscopic method (TAPP).
 Objective: To compare the outcome of TAPP and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernias.
 Methods: In this randomized controlled trial carried out at the Dept of Surgery, LGH, Lahore, for full one year a total of 80 patients with mean ages of group-A (40.4±10.69) and group-B (40.52±11.03) years based on inclusion criteria were selected and equally divided in both groups randomly. In group A, TAPP repair was done. In group B, Lichtenstein repair was done. All research parameters were recorded and calculated to get results.
 Results: Mean operative time was significantly lower for Lichtenstein Repair as compared to TAAP i.e. 44.05 vs. 52.27, P-Value = 0.001. The mean hospital stay was significantly short for TAAP as that Lichtenstein repair i.e. 2.05 days vs. 3.02 days, p-value=0.000. However postoperative infection rate was higher in patients in Lichtenstein Repair group i.e. TAAP: 10% vs Lichtenstein: 17.5%.
 Conclusion: TAAP is more effective than Lichtenstein repair by offering the patients a shorter hospital stay and less postoperative infection for treating inguinal hernia but has a little longer operative time.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.