A comparison of isometric strength and dynamic lifting capacity in men with work-related low back injuries

Abstract

Job classification, return to work status, and job placement are determined by the results of lifting capacity tests. Lifting capacity is often assessed by maximum static or dynamic physical exertions. The purpose of this study was to compare maximum isometric lifting strength with maximum dynamic lifting capacity in subjects with work-related low back injury. Twenty-seven men performed five dynamic lifting tasks and two isometric strength tests. The mean Pearson product-moment correlation between maximum isometric lifting strength measurements and maximum dynamic lifting capacity measurements was .51 with a range of .30-.73. The results indicate low to moderate associations between isometric strength measurements and lifting capacity suggesting that estimates of functional lifting capacity should not be based on static measurements alone. Dynamic lift tests are often a better simulation of the task being assessed and may be more appropriate for a back-injured population.