Abstract
In simulations, the computational method chosen to implement a model can critically affect quantitative results. Here I show that two reasonable implementations of a neighborhood model of plant growth produce predictions that differ quantitatively in several important respects. I conclude that for modelling forest canopies, pixel—based implementations should prove superior to implementations that are based on indices of neighborhood crowding.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
