A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction

Abstract

Despite the recent popularity of the in situ saphenous vein graft for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction, considerable doubt exists as to whether this approach offers any real advantage over conventional reversed vein grafts. Therefore we have reviewed our experience with 675 infrainguinal vein grafts undertaken during the past 10 years. There have been no substantial modifications in the technique used for 535 reversed vein grafts over the 10-year period. During the past 3 years, 140 in situ vein grafts have been carried out with the Leather valvulotome used to incise the venous valves. Life-table analysis of 449 femoropopliteal reversed saphenous vein grafts demonstrated 1- and 3-year cumulative patency rates of 81% and 73%, respectively, and a 5-year patency rate of 63%. Seventy-five femoropopliteal in situ bypasses demonstrated a patency rate of 85% at both 1- and 3-year intervals. Cumulative patency rates for 86 femoroinfrapopliteal reversed saphenous vein grafts were 64% and 62% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Comparable patency rates for 65 infrapopliteal in situ saphenous vein grafts remained stable at 87% for 3 years. Fifteen of the in situ bypasses were anastomosed to vessels at the ankle or foot level, whereas none of the reversed bypasses was carried that far distally. This experience with both in situ and reversed techniques on one service by the same surgeons demonstrates a clear superiority of the in situ saphenous vein graft for infrapopliteal reconstruction at the 3-year interval.