Abstract

BackgroundImmobilization after hip reconstruction in children with cerebral palsy varies according to surgeon preference. The effect of postoperative immobilization on postoperative pain is unknown. Success in achieving hip stability and complications may also differ depending on the immobilization technique utilized.Questions/purposesUsing retrospective data, we aimed to evaluate: (a) what effect does postoperative immobilization with hip spica casting versus short leg casts and bar (SLCaB); have on pain and pain management in children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy undergoing femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy? and (b) Do complications and radiographic outcomes differ between those treated postoperatively with hip spica casting and those in short leg casts?Materials and MethodsChildren with quadriplegic cerebral palsy (GMFCS IV-V, mean age 7.8 years [range: 3-15 years]) undergoing femoral or pelvic osteotomy between 2012 and 2014 in the treatment of spastic hip subluxation were reviewed. Modes of immobilization were compared, between spica casting (n=15) and SLCaB (n=12). Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative pain was quantified between groups. In-hospital epidural dosage, morphine equivalent dosages (MED), adjunctive medications, early maintenance of radiographic hip stability, and all complications were noted and analyzed.ResultsChildren were more likely to have spica cast immobilization if they were younger. Postoperative pain scores were similar between groups, with comparable patterns of epidural and MED administered during hospitalization. Spica casts were often flared up during hospitalization, but skin ulcers were uncommon and comparable between the two groups. Within 12 months of surgery, more ipsilateral femur fractures were observed distant to implants in the hip spica group, although the incidence of fractures did not meet statistical thresholds.ConclusionSpica casting and SLCaB after neuromuscular hip reconstruction did not show a difference in hip stability, narcotic pain medication usage or complication profile.

Highlights

  • The ideal post-surgical immobilization after femoral and pelvic osteotomy for children with cerebral palsy is debated, and practice varies widely

  • We aimed to evaluate: (a) what effect does postoperative immobilization with hip spica casting versus short leg casts and bar (SLCaB); have on pain and pain management in children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy undergoing femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy? and (b) Do complications and radiographic outcomes differ between those treated postoperatively with hip spica casting and those in short leg casts?

  • Postoperative pain scores were similar between groups, with comparable patterns of epidural and morphine equivalent dosages (MED) administered during hospitalization

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ideal post-surgical immobilization after femoral and pelvic osteotomy for children with cerebral palsy is debated, and practice varies widely. Such fully or partially removable immobilization may allow easier hygiene or permit the patient to sit and initiate rehabilitation therapy within days of surgery [20]. We aimed to evaluate: (a) what effect does postoperative immobilization with hip spica casting versus short leg casts and bar (SLCaB); have on pain and pain management in children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy undergoing femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy? We aimed to evaluate: (a) what effect does postoperative immobilization with hip spica casting versus short leg casts and bar (SLCaB); have on pain and pain management in children with quadriplegic cerebral palsy undergoing femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy? and (b) Do complications and radiographic outcomes differ between those treated postoperatively with hip spica casting and those in short leg casts?

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.