A comparison of hepatitis C treatment and outcomes at academic, private and Veterans' Affairs treatment centres.

Abstract

Currently, there is a lack of published data examining hepatitis C treatment practices in different care settings. To provide data describing treatment practices for patients with hepatitis C virus infection in actual clinical practice, and to examine clinical outcomes in patients treated with interferon alpha-2b/ribavirin combination therapy in academically affiliated centres, private treatment centres and Veterans' Affairs treatment centres. This multi-centre, retrospective, cohort study of 231 patients examined hepatitis C virus treatment practices in patients receiving interferon alpha-2b from January 1997 to May 2001 and explored outcomes in academically affiliated, private and Veterans' Affairs centres. Differences in treatment practice and use of diagnostic procedures were found. Genotype testing was under-utilized in non-academic sites (academic centres, 79.2%; private centres, 33.7%; Veterans' Affairs centres, 35.9%; P<0.001). Liver biopsies were performed less often in private sites (academic centres, 95.8%; private centres, 80.0%; Veterans' Affairs centres, 92.2%; P<0.01). End-of-treatment viral response (academic centres, 40.0%; private centres, 31.3%; Veterans' Affairs centres, 17.2%; P<0.05) was lower than that found in published trial data. Multivariate analysis revealed genotype 1 as the single significant predictor of treatment failure (P<0.01). Outside of the academic setting, there is significantly less diagnostic work-up performed prior to the initiation of hepatitis C virus therapy. This suggests a need for a standardization of care across treatment settings.