A Comparison of Harmonic Scalpel and Conventional Techniques for Thyroidectomy.

Abstract

Thyroidectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries. Conventional techniques using electrocautery carry the risk of tissue injury. Recently, there has been increased use of harmonic scalpels in thyroid surgery. The harmonic scalpel utilizes ultrasonic shears for cutting and coagulation, thus minimizing thermal injury. The objective of our study was to determine differences in operative duration, hypocalcemia, and RLN palsy. This single-center retrospective comparative study included consecutive patients undergoing hemithyroidectomies using the harmonic scalpel and conventional technique in the past one year (n = 64, harmonic group = 28 and conventional group = 36). The mean operative duration for the harmonic scalpel group was 70.4min, vs. 81.31min for the conventional technique group, and the difference in mean duration was found to be 10.84min (p = 0.027). There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of hypocalcemia (p = 0.751) or RLN palsy (p = 0.121). None of the patients in either group developed permanent hypocalcemia or RLN palsy. The use of a harmonic scalpel during thyroidectomy is safe. The overall surgical duration was reduced when the harmonic scalpel was used, and the complication rates were comparable to those of the conventional technique, making it a non-inferior technique for surgical intervention in thyroidectomy and warranting harmonic scalpel consideration as a valuable addition to the armamentarium of thyroid surgeons.