Abstract

Many commercial benchtop impedance analyzers are incapable of acquiring accurate tetrapolar measurements, when large electrode contact impedances are present, as in bioimpedance measurements using electrodes with micrometer-sized features. External front-end amplifiers can help overcome this issue and provide high common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) and input impedance. Several discrete component-based topologies are proposed in the literature. In this article, these are compared with new alternatives with regard to their performance in measuring known loads in the presence of electrode contact impedance models, to emulate tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements. These models are derived from bipolar impedance measurements taken from the electrodes of a tetrapolar bioimpedance sensor. Comparison with other electrode models used in the literature established that this is a good and challenging model for bioimpedance front-end amplifier evaluation. Among the examined amplifiers, one of the best performances is achieved with one of the proposed topologies based on a custom front-end with no external resistors (AD8066/AD8130). Under the specific testing conditions, it achieved an uncalibrated worst-case absolute measurement deviation of 4.4% magnitude and 4° at 20 Hz, and 2.2% and 7° at 1 MHz accordingly with loads between $10~\Omega $ and 10 $\text{k}\Omega $ . Finally, the practical use of the front-end with the impedance analyzer is demonstrated in the characterization of the bioimpedance sensor, in saline solutions of varying conductivities (2.5–20 mS/cm) to obtain its cell constant. This article serves as a guide for evaluating and choosing front-end amplifiers for tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements both with and without impedance analyzers for practical/clinical applications and material/sensor characterization.

Highlights

  • A Comparison of Front-End Amplifiers for Tetrapolar Bioimpedance MeasurementsPanagiotis Kassanos , Member, IEEE, Florent Seichepine , and Guang-Zhong Yang , Fellow, IEEE

  • T ETRAPOLAR impedance measurements are widely used in material and device characterization and sensor applications [1]–[7]

  • As discussed in the introduction and in [10], [22], [24], [28], [29], and [31], a high common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) is essential throughout the bandwidth (BW) of interest for differential amplifiers used for bioimpedance measurements

Read more

Summary

A Comparison of Front-End Amplifiers for Tetrapolar Bioimpedance Measurements

Panagiotis Kassanos , Member, IEEE, Florent Seichepine , and Guang-Zhong Yang , Fellow, IEEE. Several discrete component-based topologies are proposed in the literature In this article, these are compared with new alternatives with regard to their performance in measuring known loads in the presence of electrode contact impedance models, to emulate tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements. These are compared with new alternatives with regard to their performance in measuring known loads in the presence of electrode contact impedance models, to emulate tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements These models are derived from bipolar impedance measurements taken from the electrodes of a tetrapolar bioimpedance sensor. One of the best performances is achieved with one of the proposed topologies based on a custom front-end with no external resistors (AD8066/AD8130). This article serves as a guide for evaluating and choosing front-end amplifiers for tetrapolar bioimpedance measurements both with and without impedance analyzers for practical/clinical applications and material/sensor characterization

INTRODUCTION
FRONT-END AMPLIFIERS
Single Chip Solutions
Custom Topologies
Implementation
CMRR Simulations
BIOIMPEDANCE SENSOR CHARACTERIZATION
Bipolar Saline Solution Measurements
TETRAPOLAR SOLUTION MEASUREMENTS
Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call