Abstract
Abstract. This paper presents a quantitative comparison of the four most commonly used receptor models, namely absolute principal component scores (APCS), pragmatic mass closure (PMC), chemical mass balance (CMB) and positive matrix factorization (PMF). The models were used to predict the contributions of a wide variety of sources to PM2.5 mass in Halifax, Nova Scotia during the experiment to quantify the impact of BOReal forest fires on Tropospheric oxidants over the Atlantic using Aircraft and Satellites (BORTAS). However, particular emphasis was placed on the capacity of the models to predict the boreal wildfire smoke contributions during the BORTAS experiment. The performance of the four receptor models was assessed on their ability to predict the observed PM2.5 with an R2 close to 1, an intercept close to zero, a low bias and low RSME. Using PMF, a new woodsmoke enrichment factor of 52 was estimated for use in the PMC receptor model. The results indicate that the APCS and PMC receptor models were not able to accurately resolve total PM2.5 mass concentrations below 2 μg m−3. CMB was better able to resolve these low PM2.5 concentrations, but it could not be run on 9 of the 45 days of PM2.5 samples. PMF was found to be the most robust of the four models since it was able to resolve PM2.5 mass below 2 μg m−3, predict PM2.5 mass on all 45 days and utilise an unambiguous woodsmoke chemical tracer. The median woodsmoke relative contributions to PM2.5 estimated using PMC, APCS, CMB and PMF were found to be 0.08, 0.09, 3.59 and 0.14 μg m−3 respectively. The contribution predicted by the CMB model seemed to be clearly too high based on other observations. The use of levoglucosan as a tracer for woodsmoke was found to be vital for identifying this source.
Highlights
It has been estimated that between 1990 and 2011, wildfires have consumed a median 1.7 million ha yr−1 of Canadian boreal forest
The descriptive statistics and discussion corresponding to the observed Al, black carbon (BC), Br, Ca, Cl, Fe, K, Mg, Na, NH+4, Ni, NO−3, organic matter (OM), PM2.5 mass, S, Si, SO24−, V and Zn are provided in Gibson et al (2013b)
Leithead et al (2006) reported summertime average levoglucosan concentrations related to biomass burning in the Fraser Valley, BC of 14.4, 14.7 and 26 ng m−3 respectively, which are similar to the concentrations measured in Halifax during BORTAS-B
Summary
It has been estimated that between 1990 and 2011, wildfires have consumed a median 1.7 million ha yr−1 of Canadian boreal forest (data from Natural Resources Canada). A number of studies have used PMC to apportion the major chemical species to PM mass (Yin and Harrison, 2008; Harrison et al, 2003; Gibson et al, 2009; Dabek-Zlotorzynska et al, 2011) Another receptor model used extensively in PM2.5 source apportionment studies is absolute principal component scores (APCS) (Song et al, 2006). The models are compared based on their ability to apportion boreal wildfire woodsmoke (and other sources) applied to a 45-day contiguous PM2.5 data set sampled at the DGS in Halifax during the BORTAS-B experiment. This data set should provide sufficient variability and contributions of minor sources to permit a comprehensive comparison of the four receptor models. Gibson et al.: A comparison of four receptor models to estimate wildfire smoke PM2.5 during BORTAS-B 817
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
