Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare the newly introduced Model 2000 disposable-head Heaf gun with the currently used fixed-head gun. The study simultaneously Heaf-tested 1410 school children on both forearms using a different gun on each arm; the tests were read blind. The results were similar for both Heaf guns. The fixed-head gun gave a stronger reaction in 202 (14%) children by one Heaf grade. The disposable head gun gave a stronger reaction in 116 (8%) children, by one Heaf grade in 113 and 2 Heaf grades in 3 children. κ = 0.607 (95% confidence interval [CI] = ± 0.038), indicating good agreement between the tests. χ 2 = 0.177, d.f. = 1, P = 0.7 NS. Given the practical advantages of Heaf skin testing for primary screening, it is likely that practitioners will replace the fixed-head gun with one that avoids sterilisation problems. The small variation between the tests was not considered clinically important, while the advantages of the new test were considerable. It is therefore recommended that the Model 2000 Heaf gun replace the fixed-head gun for primary screening.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
