Abstract
ABSTRACT Biological monitoring uses assemblage structure to assess condition of ecological systems. Taxa that effectively integrate impacts within the system of interest are useful for biological monitoring, whereas taxa that do not demonstrate predictable responses can provide ambiguous or misleading indicators. We compared the effectiveness of aquatic plant and fish assemblages for biological monitoring in 16 small lakes (< 80 ha). The lakes were limnologically similar but differed in extent of lakeshore development and type of watershed land-cover. Linear regression analysis revealed that the quality of the aquatic plant community declined with increasing lakeshore development (number of dwellings per km of shoreline), which is the primary source of impacts within this group of northern Wisconsin lakes. As lakeshore development increased, we observed a decrease in the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) of a lake, number of plant species per lake, number of highly intolerant plant species per lake, and the species richness and frequency of occurrence of floating vegetation. Conversely, fish species richness, centrarchid species richness, number of small benthic fish species, intolerant fish species richness and the proportion of the total catch of intolerant and vegetative-dwelling fish were not related to lakeshore development. These results indicate that, within the range of conditions observed, aquatic plant communities are more sensitive to lakeshore development than fish communities. Neither aquatic plant species composition nor fish assemblage variables were correlated with watershed land cover types; however all the watersheds were relatively small and undisturbed. In small lakes with few fish species, aquatic plants can be used as biological indicators for monitoring ecological conditions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have