Abstract

This study aimed to compare the differences among Piezosurgery, CAS-kit, and Osteotome regarding safe elevation, perforation rate, and time spent and to observe and analyze different sinus lifting efficacy of the three methods. Twenty-one fresh goat heads (42 sinuses) were investigated. CBCT images confirmed the feasibility of the goat model. The maxillary sinus was successively lifted to 5, 7, and 9mm by Piezosurgery, CAS-kit, and Osteotome until the sinus membrane was perforated or lifted to 9mm. In the end, final elevation, sinus perforation, and time spent were recorded. Piezosurgery and CAS-kit lifted sinuses to relatively higher heights than did Osteotome (P = 0.000). Perforation rates (14.29, 21.43%) of the Piezosurgery and CAS-kit were far lower than that of the Osteotome (85.71%). In the Osteotome group, the time of lifting to 9mm was significantly shorter than that of Piezosurgery and CAS-kit (P = 0.000). There was no statistical difference in time spent between the latter two (P = 0.115). The lifting height of the Osteotome was limited, but it took the shortest time for sinus lifting. Piezosurgery and CAS-kit had higher lifting heights and lower perforation rates compared with Osteotome.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call