Abstract
Recent attention to speculative execution as a mechanism for increasing performance of single instruction streams has demanded substantially better branch prediction than what has been previously available. We [1,2] and Pan, So, and Rahmen [4] have both proposed variations of the same aggressive dynamic branch predictor for handling those needs. We call the basic model Two-Level Adaptive Branch Prediction; Pan, So, and Rahmeh call it Correlation Branch Prediction. In this paper, we adopt the terminology of [2] and show that there are really nine variations of the same basic model. We compare the nine variations with respect to the amount of history information kept. We study the effects of different branch history lengths and pattern history table configurations. Finally, we evaluate the cost effectiveness of the nine variations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
