A comparison of detrended correspondence analysis and principal co‐ordinates analysis using four sets of Tasmanian vegetation data

Abstract

AbstractIndirect gradient analysis, which entails the elucidation of relationships between trends in community composition and underlying environmental or successional gradients, is a major objective of ordination in plant ecology. Two ordination techniques, detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and principal co‐ordinates analysis (PCOA), were compared using three sets of Tasmanian vegetation data having known gradients and one set where the vegetation was expected to respond to diverse environmental variables. In every case, the results obtained by DCA were considered superior to, or at least as good as, those of PCOA. Hence, DCA appears to be the more suitable of the two methods for indirect gradient analysis.