A comparison of daily solar radiation estimates for the Northeastern United States using the Northeast Regional Climate Center and National Renewable Energy Laboratory models

Abstract

Observed solar radiation data at three sites in the northeastern United States are compared with values estimated for nearby airport locations using the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and Northeast Regional Climate Center (NRCC) models. A tendency toward considerable overestimation of relatively low values of observed solar radiation is evident in the NREL model. This bias is apparently regardless of season. A similar bias is not detected in the NRCC model. For moderate to high values of solar radiation both models produce estimates with similar accuracy for most practical applications. However, these models both tend to underestimate observed solar radiation on days when near maximum possible radiation levels are received. The tendency for the NREL model to overestimate low solar radiation values appears to be linked to the use of total sky cover, rather than the combination of cloud coverage and cloud base height information. Although total sky coverage data may be superior for estimates of moderate to high daily solar radiation values, it appears that information regarding the height of low overcast layers and the presence of obstructions to visibility, such as fog or haze, is required to accurately estimate low daily solar radiation totals.