A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed

Abstract

The Flex-R file was compared with the Lightspeed nickel-titanium file in respect to canal center movement and final canal area after instrumentation. Thirty-eight root canals in extracted human molars were divided into two equal groups of 19, in all of which the angle of curvature ranged from 20 to 35 degrees. After mounting in a mold, each root was sectioned at two locations, providing an apical and coronal section. Pre- and postinstrumentation 35 mm photographic slides of each section were projected, traced, and then scanned into a computer. From these computerized pre- and postinstrumentation images, the movement of the canal center and the area of each canal were computed at both the apical and coronal sections. Results showed significant difference in the apical canal center movement and postinstrumentation area with the Lightspeed yielding smaller values in both cases. Coronally, the Flex-R Lightspeed instruments demonstrated no significant difference in canal movement or postinstrumentation area. No significant correlation was found between the angle of root curvature and canal movement or the angle of root curvature and postinstrumentation canal area.