Abstract
Total concentrations of Cu, Pb, As, Cd, Zn, Fe, Ni and Mn were determined for 81 soil samples using two types of field portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) system; dual isotope and X-ray tube. FPXRF metal concentrations were statistically compared with analytical results from aqua regia extractions followed by Inductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP–OES) analysis. The ability of each FPXRF instrument to produce analytical results comparable to the reference method was assessed by linear regression. A high degree of linearity was found for Fe and Pb with the X-ray tube instrument and for Fe, Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd and Mn with the dual source instrument. FPXRF analyser performance improved with increased analysis time for Cu, Mn and Pb, whilst Fe, Zn, Cd, Ni and As showed no significant improvement. Particle size did not influence FPXRF analyser performance. Both the dual isotope and the X-ray tube FPXRF instruments are effective tools for rapid, quantitative assessment of soil metal contamination and for monitoring the efficacy of remediation strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
