Abstract
Rhizomes of Corallorhiza maculata and Corallorhiza striata and associated mycorrhizal fungi were dried with critical point drying (CPD) and air drying from hexamethy ldisilazane (HMDS) to compare the effectiveness of both methods in preparing specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Drying artifacts such as collapsed cells and lines and ridges on rhizome epidermal cells due to shrinkage resulted from both methods, but CPD produced the least artifacts. CPD and HMDS drying were equally effective at producing good to excellent preservation of internal features of the rhizomes and associated fungi with minimal artifacts.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
