A comparison of conventional microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry in the detection of Giardialamblia cysts in beaver fecal samples

Abstract

A variety of domestic and wild animals are considered to be potential sources of giardiasis in humans. As a result, numerous studies have been reported on the prevalence of Giardia lamblia infection in animals. The majority of these surveys have involved various floatation techniques followed by conventional microscopy in order to detect cysts in fecal samples. Immunofluorescence microscopy has become popular in recent years for the detection of G. lamblia cysts in both clinical and environmental samples. This technique can be automated by combining it with flow cytometry. The present study represents a direct comparison of conventional microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry in terms of their relative efficiency in the detection of G. lamblia cysts in beaver fecal samples. As a result of viewer fatigue, or low cyst concentrations, false negatives were common with conventional microscopy, leading to low prevalence estimates. By specifically targeting the cysts, immunofluorescence microscopy provided more reliable results in a shorter time than conventional methods. When flow cytometry was used in combination with immunofluorescence, a larger number of samples could be examined in a relatively short period of time. The results obtained indicated that this technique allowed for more consistent recognition than either conventional or immunofluorescence microscopy of positive samples containing smaller numbers of cysts.