Abstract
A comparison of conventional (amplitude and phase) and phaseless (amplitude only) planar near-field measurements for non-ideal measuring probe locations is examined via a simulated array antenna case study. It is hypothesized that the presented phase retrieval algorithm will better reproduce the true pattern of the antenna under test (AUT) because of the diminished sensitivity of the amplitude of the near-field, as compared to the phase, with respect to the measuring probe locations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
