Abstract
ABSTRACT This article compares child welfare outcomes and cost savings when 30 Days to Family® is implemented in contrasting policy and practice contexts and at early and mature stages of implementation. Across all contexts and stages, children served, when compared with those eligible but not served, were more likely to be placed with kin, to spend fewer days in foster care, and to experience better permanency outcomes. Those placed with kin, when compared with those not with kin, experienced greater placement stability and fewer placements in treatment settings. Substantial cost savings were demonstrated in both favorable and less-favorable implementation conditions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
