Abstract

BackgroundInstrumented treadmills facilitate analysis of consecutive strides in ways that typical overground gait data collections cannot. Researchers have quantified differences between joint kinetic measures whilst walking on an instrumented treadmill compared to those walking overground. The reason for such differences has not yet been established. Research QuestionCan we identify the source or sources of these errors by comparing centre of pressure and ground reaction force measurements recorded on a treadmill to those collected overground? MethodsKinematic and kinetic data were recorded while nineteen individuals walked continuously at their self-selected walking speed overground and on a treadmill. Comparisons of the centre of pressure and ground reaction forces were made between the two conditions using 2-tailed paired t-tests and Cohen’s d effect size. ResultsThe results indicated that participants had significantly faster backwards, lateral and medial centre of pressure velocities when walking on a treadmill compared to when they were walking overground. Additionally, participants also had significantly reduced peak propulsive ground reaction forces when walking on a treadmill than walking overground. SignificanceThese results suggest that shear forces caused by the belts sliding over the treadmill force platforms affect the centre of pressure during early stance, and the minimal acceleration of a participant’s centre of mass during treadmill walking results in reduced propulsive force during late stance. Therefore, care should be taken during studies when comparing kinetic gait variables between overground and treadmill walking.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call