Abstract

BackgroundTo investigate associations between annual average air pollution exposures and health, most epidemiological studies rely on estimated residential exposures because information on actual time-activity patterns can only be collected for small populations and short periods of time due to costs and logistic constraints. In the current study, we aim to compare exposure assessment methodologies that use data on time-activity patterns of children with residence-based exposure assessment. We compare estimated exposures and associations with lung function for residential exposures and exposures accounting for time activity patterns. MethodsWe compared four annual average air pollution exposure assessment methodologies; two rely on residential exposures only, the other two incorporate estimated time activity patterns. The time-activity patterns were based on assumptions about the activity space and make use of available external data sources for the duration of each activity. Mapping of multiple air pollutants (NO2, NOX, PM2.5, PM2.5absorbance, PM10) at a fine resolution as input to exposure assessment was based on land use regression modelling. First, we assessed the correlations between the exposures from the four exposure methods. Second, we compared estimates of the cross-sectional associations between air pollution exposures and lung function at age 8 within the PIAMA birth cohort study for the four exposure assessment methodologies. ResultsThe exposures derived from the four exposure assessment methodologies were highly correlated (R > 0.95) for all air pollutants. Similar statistically significant decreases in lung function were found for all four methods. For example, for NO2 the decrease in FEV1 was −1.40% (CI; −2.54, −0.24%) per IQR (9.14 μg/m3) for front door exposure, and −1.50% (CI; −2.68, −0.30%) for the methodology which incorporates time activity pattern and actual school addresses. ConclusionsExposure estimates from methods based on the residential location only and methods including time activity patterns were highly correlated and associated with similar decreases in lung function. Our study illustrates that the annual average exposure to air pollution for 8-year-old children in the Netherlands is sufficiently captured by residential exposures.

Highlights

  • Outdoor air pollution is an important determinant of health, and has been estimated to be related to 4.2 million premature deaths annually (World Health Organization, 2018)

  • Outdoor air pollution has been shown to have short- and long-term im­ pacts on the lung function of children (Gotschi et al, 2008; Paulin and Hansel, 2016; Schultz et al, 2017), which is an objective measure of respiratory health and predictor of cardio-respiratory morbidity and mortality (Sin et al, 2005)

  • Actual personal exposure can be described as the timeweighted average air pollution concentration across all activities of a person (Sexton and Barry, 1988)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Outdoor air pollution is an important determinant of health, and has been estimated to be related to 4.2 million premature deaths annually (World Health Organization, 2018). Most epidemiological studies mainly rely on residential exposures to characterize individual exposure and on annual average air pollution at typically the front door or at the centre of the parcel of the residence (Clark et al, 2010; Gehring et al, 2013; Kramer et al, 2009; Nordling et al, 2008). Methods: We compared four annual average air pollution exposure assessment methodologies; two rely on res­ idential exposures only, the other two incorporate estimated time activity patterns. Conclusions: Exposure estimates from methods based on the residential location only and methods including time activity patterns were highly correlated and associated with similar decreases in lung function. Our study il­ lustrates that the annual average exposure to air pollution for 8-year-old children in the Netherlands is suffi­ ciently captured by residential exposures

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call