Abstract
Two state-of-the-art simulation methods for computing adsorption properties in porous materials like zeolites and metal-organic frameworks are compared: the configurational bias Monte Carlo (CBMC) method and the recently proposed continuous fractional component Monte Carlo (CFCMC) method. We show that CFCMC is a very significant improvement over CBMC, and we can recommend it as our preferred method of choice. It is faster, more reliable, and (in contrast to CBMC) provides insight on whether or not the results are properly equilibrated. We also show that it is possible to combine the methods in a new CB/CFCMC hybrid method and derive the acceptance rules. This method achieves even higher insertion acceptance ratios.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
