A comparison of 8-mm and open-irrigated gold-tip catheters for typical atrial flutter ablation: Data from a prospective multicenter registry.

Abstract

BackgroundCavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is the standard treatment for patients suffering from CTI‐dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The aim of this study was to compare the use in clinical practice of 8‐mm gold‐tip catheter (8mmRFC) and open‐irrigated gold‐tip catheter (irrRFC) for RF typical AFL ablation.MethodsPatients with typical AFL were treated with 8mmRFC or irrRFC catheters according to investigator preferences. The primary endpoint was the cumulative radiofrequency time (CRFT). Fluoroscopy time, acute and 6‐month success rates were secondary endpoints.ResultsAfter excluding 3 patients with left AFL, 157 of the enrolled patients (median age 71.8 [interquartile range, 64.1‐76.2], 76% men, 91% in NYHA class ≤II, 65% with no structural heart disease) were analyzed: 74 (47%) subjects were treated with the 8mmRFC and 83 (53%) with the irrRFC. The median CRFT was 3 [2‐6] minutes in the 8mmRFC group and 5 [3‐7] minutes in the irrRFC group (P = .183). There were no significant differences in ablation success rates, intraprocedural CTI reconnections, audible steam pops, and procedural times. In the 8mmRFC group, a significantly lower fluoroscopy time was observed as compared to the irrRFC group (8 [5‐12] vs 15 [10‐20] minutes, P < .001). During the follow‐up period, AFL recurrences were documented in 3 patients in the 8mmRFC group and 2 in the irrRFC group (P = .655).ConclusionsThe 8mmRFC and the irrRFC performed similarly in routine practice for CTI ablation in terms of cumulative RF time, acute and 6‐month success rates. Fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in the 8mmRFC group.