Abstract

To compare 1,470-nm endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of patients with great saphenous vein diameters of 10mm ormore. One hundred twenty consecutive patients presenting to the cardiovascular surgery department with a great saphenous vein diameter exceeding 10mm at the saphenofemoral junction between January and December 2013 were included in the study. Thefirst randomly selected 60 patients (group 1) received 1,470-nm EVLA and the other60patients(group 2) received RFA. Patients were assessed on the second day, the first week, and the first, third, and sixth months. Major and minor complications were recorded. Minor complications in EVLA and RFA were hyperemia at 20% and 30% (P=0.50), ecchymosis at 16.7% and 48.3% (P=0.02), and edema at 40.0% and 65.5% (P<0.08), respectively. No major complication was observed in any patient. Recanalization developed during monitoring in 3 patients in the RFA group, a rate of 5%. No recanalization was observed in the EVLA group. Success rates in the EVLA and RFA groups were 100% and 95%, respectively. Mean time to return to daily activity was 0.7days in the EVLA group and 1.4days in the RFA group (P<0.006), whereas mean time to return to work was 1.8days in the EVLA group and 2.2days in the RFA group (P<0.07). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of pain during the procedure or postoperatively. Less pain was reported in the EVLA during both (P<0.02). EVLA using a 1,470-nm radial fiber is superior to RFA in the treatment of saphenous veins larger than 10mm in diameter.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.