A Comparison Between Ultrasound Pachymetry and CASIA2 (Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography) in the Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness.

Abstract

Background and objective Due in part to its effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, the assessment of central corneal thickness (CCT) is recognized as an essential part of the initial glaucoma assessment. The most widely utilized clinical technique to measure CCT is ultrasound pachymetry (USP). In recent years, many dedicated anterior-segment optical coherence tomography scanners (AS-OCTs) have been developed. Previous studies have compared CCT measurements between USP and various AS-OCTs. This study aimed to assess the degree of agreement between USP and CASIA2 (Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan), a second-generation swept-source AS-OCT developed in Japan. Methodology The data on CCT screening measurements of 156 eyes (88 patients)performed over a period of three months, from January to March 2020, on glaucoma patients attending the Royal Hallamshire Hospital (RHH) in Sheffield, UKwere collected retrospectively and statistically analyzed. Results The average age of the 88 patients included in the study was 66 years (range: 20-86 years). Our findingsshow that when compared to CASIA2 measurements, USP measurement of the CCT resulted in significantly thicker values (paired t-test: t=23.15,p<2.2 x 10-16). The average difference between the two methods was 19.98 ±10.78 μm. It is hypothesized that this difference may be duein partto inaccurate probe placement during ultrasound probemeasurement, resulting in thicker CCT values. Conclusion The observed difference may be clinically significant as it could induce clinical discrepancy in terms of perceived glaucoma risk in patients. Therefore, USP and CASIA2 should not be used interchangeably, and clinicians should take into account the significant difference between these methods.