A comparison between the titanium-based and the zinc phosphate dispersion conditionings of zinc phosphate baths

Abstract

ABSTRACT Phosphating is a metallic surface treatment widely used in the industrial environment as it provides greater adhesion of the paint film to the metallic substrate and greater efficiency in inhibiting corrosion. The conditioning agents in the phosphating process contribute to reducing the time to obtain the phosphate layer and favor the refinement of the formed crystals. Commercially, the most used conditioning agent is based on titanium salts, however, it is possible that other compounds may be an alternative in optimizing the industrial process. Therefore, with the aim of reducing the time and temperature of the phosphating process, this work aims to verify the performance of using the conditioning agent based on zinc phosphate in obtaining the phosphatized layer, in terms of corrosion resistance, in comparison with to the titanium-based conditioner. For this purpose, SAE 1010 carbon steel samples were degreased and sandblasted, immersed for 1 minute in the conditioning solution (titanium or zinc phosphate) and phosphated with a commercial solution of tricationic zinc phosphate at different temperatures (40 and 50°C) and immersion times (2, 3 and 4 minutes). The deposited masses of the phosphate coatings were measured and the coatings characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), through electrochemical tests of open circuit potential and potentiodynamic polarization. The results showed that the greater coverage of the substrate, with the formation of denser layers, improves the anticorrosive performance of samples phosphated with both conditioners. For the titanium-based conditioner, the optimal phosphating conditions were 3 min at 50°C, while for the zinc phosphate conditioner, they were 2 min at 40°C. Therefore, for commercial use, immersion in a zinc phosphate-based conditioner is indicated, followed by phosphating for 2 min at 40°C.