Abstract
In this paper we compare five well-known methods of apportionment, advanced respectively by Adams, Dean, Hill, Webster and Jefferson. The criterion used for this comparison is the minimization of the distance between a power vector and a population vector. Power is measured with the well-known Banzhaf power index; the populations are those of the constituent states of the USA. We first explain the conditions under which this comparison has plausibility. We then compare apportionment methods in terms of their capacity to move power in states closer to their populations. The election of the US President by an electoral college is studied by examining 22 censuses since 1790. Our analysis is largely based on that used in the book by Balinski and Young [2001]. The empirical findings are linked to theoretical results.*
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
