A Comparison between the Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery on the Quality and Depth of Anesthesia.

Abstract

Background:Strabismus surgery may be associated with several undesirable complications as increased incidence of the oculocardiac reflex (OCR), hemodynamic changes, emergency agitation (EA), postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting. Previous studies suggested that deeper anesthesia monitored by bispectral index (BIS) protects against OCR. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the type of anesthesia on the quality of anesthesia in pediatric patients.Patients and Methods:One hundred American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II pediatric patients, aged between 3 and 6 years old of both genders, who were subjected to strabismus surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized into two equal groups (each = 50); in the first group, anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane (Group S), and in the second group, anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol (Group P). Hemodynamics and BIS were monitored, and OCR and the need for atropine were recorded. Furthermore, EA using the Cravero scale was recorded.Results:The propofol group showed a higher incidence of OCR while the sevoflurane group had a higher incidence of postoperative agitation, pain, nausea, and vomiting, without statistically significant differences regarding hemodynamics.Conclusion:Although sevoflurane anesthesia may be superior to propofol in ameliorating OCR, it has been associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications.