Abstract
In this article, the authors report a detailed comparative study on the growth of single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) from monometallic and its oxide (intentionally oxidized) catalysts. The difference and findings are summarized in the following three aspects. 1) High‐quality SWNTs are also grown from intentionally oxidized Co nanoparticles, but the yield of SWNTs significantly decreases, resulting in random network rather than vertically aligned SWNT arrays. 2) The authors clarify from in‐plane transmission electron microscopy that Co oxide nanoparticles grow SWNTs through an in situ reduction process, which means Co oxide becomes metallic Co after the introduction of ethanol; direct growth from an oxide phase is not observed. 3) Compared to the SWNTs grown by pre‐reduced catalysts, SWNTs grown from intentionally oxidized catalysts show narrower diameter distribution and smaller average diameter from Raman spectra. The strategy also shows similar results in the Ni catalysts. The findings are helpful to improve the controllability of SWNT diameter and morphology, as well as the reproducibility and robustness of CVD process.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
