Abstract
In 2011, the National Education Committee of Finland published “The Framework for Off-campus Education in Primary and Secondary Schools”, which stipulated the goals, content, and implementing guarantee of the off-campus education in primary and secondary schools. Besides, while emphasizing the equal importance of on-campus and off-campus education, the “Framework” also advocated schools to actively deal with the challenges posed to off-campus education, ensured its high quality and efficiency from all aspects, and cultivated primary and secondary school students’ emotional cognition, so as to enhance the level of their moral cognition. As a result, The “Framework” has profoundly promoted the development of off-campus education in Finnish primary and secondary schools. The off-campus education of china has certain problems relatively, such as the lack of system management, while quality is not guaranteed. However China has invested a lot of human, financial and material resources in basic education these years, and appropriate measures have been taken to address the problem of excessive burden on students. Moreover, much importance was attached to strengthening the construction and management of off-campus education sites, and enriching students’ extracurricular education. The author’s current study opted to compare Finland and China on Off-campus Education of Primary and Secondary Schools. Implications for Chinese education are discussed.
Highlights
IntroductionIn 2011, the National Education Committee of Finland published “The Framework for Off-campus Education in
In 2011, the National Education Committee of Finland published “The Framework for Off-campus Education inHow to cite this paper: He, Q. and Fu, D.L. (2014) A Comparison between Finland and China on Off-Campus Education of Primary and Secondary Schools
The “Basic Education Act” promulgated by Finnish government had clarified the relevant regulations for the off-campus education, it failed to be transformed into effective action
Summary
In 2011, the National Education Committee of Finland published “The Framework for Off-campus Education in. (2014) A Comparison between Finland and China on Off-Campus Education of Primary and Secondary Schools. Primary and Secondary Schools”, whose goals, content, guiding principles, implementing regulations, and assessment criteria are highly consistent with its fiscal policy. The “Framework” entered into force on August 1 in that year when all the local authorities were required to modify the policies of off-campus education in accordance with “The Framework for Off-campus Education in Primary and Secondary Schools”, seriously organize off-campus education, and treat on-campus education and off-campus education. China published “The National Medium- and Long-Term Plan for Education Reform and Development (2010 to 2020)”, which regards compulsory education as one of the eight tasks of development over the 10 years. Much importance was attached to strengthening the construction and management of off-campus education sites, and enriching students’ extracurricular education [1]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
