Abstract

AbstractIn this paper we compare two methods, a recursive method based on an inverse mechanical formulation and a method based on a recursive shape optimization formulation, in order to solve inverse form finding problems in isotropic elastoplasticity. Both methods are succinctly presented and a numerical example is given. It was found that no difference could be found between the node coordinates on the undeformed configurations computed with both methods. However the convergence to the solution is faster with the recursive method based on an inverse mechanical formulation than with the method based on shape optimization. (© 2014 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call