Abstract

Coupling discrete element method (DEM) with computational fluid dynamics including Navier-Stokes theories (CFD-DEM) and Lattice Botlzmann method (LBM-DEM) has been used widely to model the response of soil foundation under increasing seepage flows; however, a comparison of these methods in predicting soil and fluid behaviours during fluidization has not been carried out in a rigorous way. The current paper will hence provide an evaluation on their performance by applying them to model a laboratory test where a sandy soil is subjected to fluidization process under increasing hydraulic gradient. A brief discussion about the differences in their theories and numerical algorithm is made before the DEM is used to simulate a representative soil element while NS-based CFD and LBM are used separately to model upward fluid flows. The mutual interactions between fluid and solid phases are carried out and update to each other through third-party platforms. The results show relatively similar hydraulic conductivity predicted by the two methods, which agrees well with the experimental data; however, the critical hydraulic gradient estimated by LBM-DEM coupling is found closer to the experimental value. The CFD-DEM coupling provides more stable computation through its averaged fluid variables, whereas LBM-DEM coupling can provide more detailed interactions between fluid and soil particles at micro-scale due to its high resolution. The study then suggests several conditions which can optimize the efficiency of using these methods in practical applications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call