Abstract

There are cases where gyrotron interaction simulations predict dynamic After-Cavity Interaction (ACI). In dynamic ACI, a mode is excited by the electron beam at a dominant frequency in the gyrotron cavity and, at the same time, this mode is also interacting with the beam at a different frequency in the non-linear uptaper after the cavity. In favor of dynamic ACI being a real physical effect, there are some experimental findings that could be attributed to it, as well as some physical rationale indicating the possibility of a mode being resonant with the beam at different frequencies in different regions. However, the interaction codes used in dynamic ACI prediction up to now are based on simplifications that put questions on their capability of correctly simulating this effect. In this work, the shortcomings of the usual simplifications with respect to dynamic ACI modeling, namely, the trajectory approach and the single-frequency boundary condition, are identified. Extensive simulations of dynamic ACI cases are presented, using several “in-house” as well as commercial codes. We report on the comparison and the assessment of different modeling approaches and their results and we discuss whether, in some cases, dynamic ACI can be a numerical artifact or not. Although the possibility of existence of dynamic ACI in gyrotrons is not disputed, it is concluded that the widely used trajectory approach for gyrotron interaction modeling is questionable for simulating dynamic ACI and can lead to misleading results.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call