Abstract

The effects of powder feedstocks prepared by different methods on the processibility of the powders and the performance of final components have largely been unexplored in metal additive manufacturing (MAM). In this paper, we conducted a comparative study on the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process of Inconel 718 (IN718) powders produced by gas atomization (GA) and plasma rotating electrode process (PREP), respectively. For the GA and PREP powders, the powder characteristics, such as chemical composition, particle size distribution (PSD), powder morphology and powder defects are initially characterized and compared. Parallel single-track experiments and cuboid components printing have also been designed and carried out in the LPBF process by using these two types of powders. Forming quality and mechanical properties of different components are systematically evaluated. The results show that the powder feedstocks do not significantly affect the mechanical properties under the optimized LPBF process parameters. However, the PREP powder, with smooth surface, higher sphericity, higher apparent density and better flowability, can obtain a larger processing window and more stable mechanical properties of the as-built parts than the GA powder.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.