Abstract
This paper constructs a comparison framework of the cloud-based platform model consisting of cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability, and randomly selects 610 of Chinese maker space and American maker space as comparable samples. A comparative study was made on the status quo of its development. The study found that the similarity lies in the fact that both China and the US have rapidly grown in number, creating more than 30 types of cloud functions, gathering more than 80 types of cloud resources, forming a cloud collaboration network, and initially generating a sustainable cloud platform ecosystem. The difference is that the US created a space early, on the cloud to form an advanced infrastructure with 3D printing as the standard, highlighting online interaction on cloud functions, vertical areas on cloud resources, and cloud collaboration pursue intelligent matching and comprehensively utilize up to 12 revenue channels in cloud sustainability. Aiming at the problems existing in Chinese maker space cloud platform model, this paper reveals the external manifestation of the US maker space cloud platform model. It gives enlightenment to China from cloud foundation, cloud function, cloud resource, cloud collaboration and cloud sustainability. And revealing the logic of internal development, and proposing that Chinese mass maker space should be “table” and “inside” and to promote the soundness and development of the model of space cloud platform in China.
Highlights
A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker SpaceEmail address: To cite this article: Lv Bo, Gu Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao
Since the beginning of 2015, maker space has been officially proposed in the national documents and has been listed as a strong support for development
Maker space platform provides various cloud business function interfaces. These cloud function interfaces are mainly divided into three categories: The first category is self-built cloud function, which is independently developed by maker space platform, and entrepreneurs can directly enter after clicking The core of the creation of the space itself; the second type is the embedded cloud function, the entrepreneur clicks on the functional interface and links to the core cloud of other professional intermediaries
Summary
Email address: To cite this article: Lv Bo, Gu Qiaoling, Zhi Yechao. A Comparative Study on Cloud Platform Model of Chinese and American Maker Space. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences. Received: October 11, 2019; Accepted: November 3, 2019; Published: November 8, 2019
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.