A comparative study on characterizing the fracture toughness variations in thick-wall hydrogenation reactor welded joint by spherical indentation tests

Abstract

This study provides an investigation on the existing models in predicting the fracture toughness distributions in thick-wall hydrogenation reactor welded joint from SITs. Three criterions, namely the critical stress, the critical strain, and the critical damage variable, were used in determining the critical indentation depth in the IEF model, together with the ERR model. Experimental results proved that none of the existing four criterions (or models) works for all zones in the welded joint. The critical stress criterion well reproduces the decrease of KIC in the weld (compared with that of the base metal) and the KIC distributions along the thickness, but may provide highly non-conservative predictions (more than 100% over-estimation). Highly stable KIC predictions were obtained from the critical strain criterion and the ERR model, but the critical strain criterion failed in characterizing weakest parts of the welded joint (i.e., the HAZ and weld) as assuming all zones with the same plasticity, and the ERR model failed in characterizing one of the weakest parts (i.e., weld) due to the existence of initial damage. Compared with the critical strain criterion and the ERR model, highly instable prediction results were observed in the CDV criterion, with the maximum error exceeds 50%. Source of errors in the existing fracture toughness prediction models were extensively explored through the physical basis of each criterion (or model) and from the solidarity of the phenomenologically summarized criterions.