Abstract
The paper investigates blind finite-impulse-response (FIR) equalization schemes for quadrature amplitude modulation signalling. We compare a bootstrap maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) equalizer with a recently introduced concurrent constant modulus algorithm (CMA) and decision directed (DD) equalizer (CMA+DD). Both equalizers are known to outperform the CMA considerably in the situations where carrier recovery is performed and the signal constellation is known. The concurrent CMA+DD equalizer has a complexity that is slightly more than twice of the CMA, and the bootstrap MAP equalizer has computational requirements that are only slightly more complex than the CMA. Simulation results indicate that the bootstrap MAP blind FIR equalizer has a faster convergence rate and better steady-state performance than the concurrent CMA+DD blind FIR equalizer, but tuning of the former is more complicated than the latter.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
