A Comparative Study of the Changes in Condylar Position after Mandibular Setback Using Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy between Surgery-After and Surgery-First Orthognathic Surgery

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Complication after Extraoral Vertical and Intraoral Oblique Osteotomy have been reported but in a comprehensive manner. Although intuitively the profile of complications after Intra Oral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy (IVRO) would be similar to subcondylar osteotomy, the technique of the two procedures are different, and thus unfavorable outcome after surgery also may differ. The aim of this study was evaluate the morbidity and complications following correcton of mandibular deformity by IVRO. Material and Method: A prospective study was undertaken of 271 consecutively treated orthognathic surgical patients with mandibular deformity(without mandibular deficiency). Each patients was treated by bilateral IVRO with 2 Weeks of maxillo-mandibular fixation and no interosseous fixation of proximal segment. Method of Data Analysis: Postoperative stability ,immediately after surgery ,at 6 months , and at 12 months after surgeryweremade. Complications consist of vascular complications, nerve injury, infection, condylar luxation andbonehearingwere assessedby retrospective individual chart review. Results: The mean blood loss was 47g and no severe bleeding during operation. There was no wound infection and avascular necrosis after surgery. Inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance remained 2 operative sites but was not permanent. Malocclusion after surgery was manifest by either relapse or anterior open bite occurred in 3 patients. Condylar dislocation occurred 1 patient. Conclusion: Our studies indicated that surgical correction of mandibular deformity by IVRO had a beneficial effect not only on occlusion but also upon complication after surgery.