A Comparative Study of Specific Yield Determinations for a Shallow Sand Aquifer

Abstract

ABSTRACTUsing the type‐curve methods of Boulton (1963) and Neuman (1972), and comparisons, at various times, of the cumulative volume of water pumped to the volume of the water‐table drawdown cone (volume‐balance method), values of specific yield were obtained from pumping test data from numerous piezometers in an unconfined sand aquifer. The long‐term value of specific yield for the aquifer was determined from measurements of the laboratory drainage curve of the aquifer material.The volume‐balance method gave specific yield values of 0.02, 0.05, 0.12, 0.20, 0.23, and 0.25 at times of 0.25, 0.66, 10, 26, 45, and 65 hours, respectively, indicating a gradual increase in specific yield and an asymptotic approach to the long‐term value of 0.30 determined from the laboratory method. The type‐curve methods provided values of 0.07 and 0.08, which correspond to the volume‐balance values at early times, but which are less than one‐third of the value obtained from the laboratory method and from the volume‐balance method applied at the end of the pumping test (2.7 days). The type‐curve procedures therefore provide unrealistically low values of specific yield for application to problems concerning the long‐term yield characteristics of the aquifer.The observed trend towards increasing values of specific yield with increasing duration of pumping, and the vertical hydraulic head profiles that were measured during the pumping test indicate that both delayed drainage from above the water table and downward hydraulic gradients in the saturated zone can be important hydraulic effects contributing to the delayed‐drawdown segment that is characteristic of time‐drawdown graphs for unconfined aquifers.