Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents a comparative study of two discriminative methods, i.e., Rival Penalized Competitive Learning (RPCL) and Minimum Classification Error (MCE), for the tasks of Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition (LVCSR). MCE aims at minimizing a smoothed sentence error on training data, while RPCL focus on avoiding misclassification through enforcing the learning of correct class and de-learning its best rival class. For a fair comparison, both the two discriminative mechanisms are implemented at state level. The LVCSR results show that both MCE and RPCL perform better than Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), while RPCL has better discriminative and generative abilities than MCE.KeywordsRival penalized competitive learningminimum classification errordiscriminative traininglarge vocabulary continuous speech recognition
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
