A Comparative Study of Point-of-Care Prothrombin Time in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery

Abstract

Point-of-care (POC) devices allow for prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR) testing in whole blood (WB) and timely administration of plasma or prothrombin complex concentrate during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. This study evaluated the sensitivities of a new POC PT test, a dry-hematology method with heparin neutralization technology (DRIHEMATO PT-S [DRI PT-S]; A&T Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan), and compared it with other POC tests currently available. Prospective, observational study. University hospital, single center. Healthy volunteers and warfarin-treated and cardiac surgical patients. In WB samples obtained from 6 healthy volunteers, PT-INR results of DRI PT-S were not affected by an in vitro addition of heparin <6.0 U/mL. In warfarin-treated samples (n = 88, PT/INR 0.98-3.87), PT-INR with DRI PT-S showed acceptable correlation with the laboratory method (r2 = 0.85, p < 0.001). In blood samples obtained from cardiac surgical patients (n = 72), heparin prolonged the PT/INR with the laboratory assay, dry-hematology method with non heparin neutralization technology (DRI PT), Coaguchek XS (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), and Hemochron Jr. (Accriva Diagnostics, Edison, NJ), but DRI PT-S was not affected by heparin anticoagulation. In nonheparinized samples, different methods between DRI PT-S and the laboratory method yielded acceptable correlations (r2 = 0.76, p < 0.0001). There was a moderate correlation between factor levels and the PT-INR with DRI PT-S (factor [F]II: r2 = 0.63, FVII: r2 = 0.47, FX: r2 = 0.67; p < 0.0001). This study demonstrated that PT/INR can be accurately assessed using the dry-hematology method in WB under therapeutic heparin levels. Currently available other POC PT/INR tests are affected by heparin, and thus they are not recommended for coagulation monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass.