Abstract
Abstract Combined sieve-hydrometer method (SHM) is one of the two conventional methods commonly used in research and practice in all branches of science and engineering dealing with soils. SHM, however, has some inborn defects, which lead to systematical errors. The paper discusses the major causes of such errors in the analysis with examples from saprolitic soils derived from granites and volcanics. It is concluded that the deviations may be explained by three factors: differences in definitions and measurements of particle sizes; variations in densities of constituent grains; and turbulence in flow pattern of suspension. Particle size distribution (PSD) curves produced by the laser diffraction method (LDM) generally agree with those of SHM. However, some discrepancies between the results of these methods become evident upon closer inspection, and vary in extent according to the soil type and specific size fraction. For the same soil sample and a given fraction, such discrepancies can be mainly attributed to variations in density, shape, and mineralogy of particles. LDM with its many advantages over SHM should be adopted as the standard in geoengineering and geoenvironmental research, particularly involving problematic soils.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
