Abstract
Abstract Carbonate can be produced in a variety of environments on the Earth's surface, such as shallow seas and deep oceans, continental lakes, soils and subsurface aquifers. The carbonate content of sediments is an important proxy in paleoceanography and paleoclimatology and is often used to reconstruct paleoenvironmental evolution of the earth. Many methods have been reported to measure the content of carbonate in sediments, but how those methods perform (e.g. degree of accuracy and precision, error-induced factors, operability, cost and time) remains understudied. Here, we employ three widely-used non-instrumental methods, including acid-base titration, gasometric method, and loss on ignition (LOI) based on muffle combustion, together with X-ray diffraction for mineral phase analysis, to compare the carbonate content data of sediments from deep ocean (water depths from 1218 m to 6147 m) of the western Pacific and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks from the Qaidam basin, northern Tibetan Plateau. The results show that data accuracies of most methods are closely related to mineral compositions in sediments (e.g. carbonate species and clay mineral contents) and analytical operations. Non-instrumental methods generally demonstrate low precisions (avg. RSD of 3.36%) in determining sediments with low carbonate contents (
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.