Abstract

Some researchers argue that linguistic knowledge of one’s native language facilitates the acquisition of additional languages (see, for example, Cenoz & Valencia, 1994; Grenfell & Harris, 2006; Hakuta, 1990; Keshavarz & Astaneh, 2004). To contribute to this line of research, the present study investigated the probability of significant differences among monolingual and bilingual EFL learners in their awareness and perceived use of metacognitive reading strategies and in the subscales of these strategies (i.e., global, supportive, and problem-solving strategies). To achieve this goal, 100 Persian monolingual and 100 Azeri Turkish-Persian bilingual male and female second-year university students, majoring in English Literature, ELT, and Translation with the age range of 20-28 participated in the study. Both groups took the Nelson Test of English language proficiency and completed the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI) questionnaire. Participants’ reading strategy use was determined by asking them to rate their self-perceived reading ability in English on a 5-point Likert scale. The results of data analyses revealed significant differences between monolingual and bilingual learners in the use of overall and global metacognitive reading strategies with bilingual learners having greater awareness of these two strategies. However, no significant difference was found between monolingual and bilingual participants in the use of problem-solving and supportive metacognitive strategies.

Highlights

  • A distinction has been made between cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies by scholars in the field, most notably Oxford (1990) and Chamot & O’Malley (1996)

  • The results of the present study revealed that bilingual EFL learners use overall and global MRSs more than monolingual learners

  • The analysis of self-reported data in the present study indicates that bilingual learners use Overall and Global MRSs more than monolingual EFL learners

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A distinction has been made between cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies by scholars in the field, most notably Oxford (1990) and Chamot & O’Malley (1996). The significant role of metacognitive awareness in reading comprehension has been widely acknowledged (Alexander & Jetton, 2000; Guthrie & Wigfield, 1999; Pressley, 2000; Şenay Şen, 2009; Sheory & Mokhtari, 2001; and Xianming, 2007). There is general consensus among researchers that metacognition, i.e., strategic awareness and monitoring of the comprehension process on the part of the language learner, is a significant aspect of successful reading (Alexander & Jetton, 2000; Pressley, 2000; Pressley & Afflerbach, 1995; and Sheory & Mokhtari, 2001)

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call