Abstract

A Low-Reynolds Number (LRN) k–ε model can well simulate the transition characteristics of the momentum boundary layer, but so far, there are few studies on the influence of boundary layer transition on heat transfer characteristics by using the LRN k–ε model. Due to the larger degree of flexibility and controllability of flow parameters than the conventional boundary layer, a wall jet is an ideal flow configuration to research the transition of the boundary layer. To investigate the performance of the LRN k–ε model in simulating the heat transfer characteristics of the wall jet with boundary layer transition, six versions of LRN k–ε models are used to simulate a three-dimensional wall jet with boundary layer transition and the computational results were compared with experimental data. It is found that the Abe–Kondoh–Nagano (AKN) and Yang–Shih (YS) models can accurately simulate the flow field and heat transfer of the laminar boundary layer due to the use of the Kolmogorov scale in the developing region. Compared with the YS model, the AKN model is capable of predicting the influence of boundary layer transition on the heat transfer process in good agreement with experimental results over the whole domain. From the calculation results, it is found that Abid and Change and Hsieh and Chen models are more appropriate for simulating the heat transfer in the fully turbulent region of the wall jet. The damping function fµ of the Lam–Bremhorst and Launder–Sharma models approaches a constant value near the wall, which does not meet the wall limiting conditions and leads to a negative impact on the simulation of heat transfer near the wall.

Highlights

  • Discussion on the flow field and developing boundary layer characteristics of the wall jet Figure 4 shows a comparison of dimensionless velocity profiles for the wall jet at different streamwise positions predicted by six lowReynolds number k–ε models with experimental data

  • In the wall jet developing region, there exists a great velocity gradient near the wall, which leads to a higher viscous shear stress and a thinner laminar boundary layer

  • Due to the strong three-dimensional nonlinear effect of the flow field near the nozzle, the linear eddy viscosity turbulence model based on Boussinesq hypothesis has some deviations

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A wall jet, formed by a high momentum fluid ejecting from a narrow slot along a flat plate, is a very common flow phenomenon and has been widely used in fluid heat transfer applications, such as electronic component cooling, defrosting and defogging of automotive windshield, and cooling of turbine vanes. It consists of two main parts: the inner shear layer near the wall similar to the wall boundary layer and the outer shear layer away from the wall. The development of the momentum boundary layer in the inner shear layer of the wall jet has a great influence on heat and mass transfer processes. in the initial stage of the jet development, during the transition from the laminar boundary layer to the turbulent boundary layer, the flow and heat transfer will change significantly. Earlier, Launder and Rodi have mentioned that the wall jet is an ideal flow configuration for resolving these intricate interactions that dominate the conventional turbulent boundary layer because it offers a larger degree of flexibility and controllability of parameters than a boundary layer does. Over the past few years, previous researchers have carried out a lot of numerical simulation studies on the wall jet using turbulence models or the direct numerical simulation method.2,11–13 Among those turbulence models, the Low-Reynolds Number (LRN) k–ε models have been widely used to predict the wall jet due to their simplicity and capability of resolving the entire boundary layer including the viscous sublayer region near the wall. The simulated and experimentally measured transitional flow and heat transfer characteristics in the initial stage of the wall boundary layer were analyzed and evaluated in detail to provide a reliable reference for the selection of models in the field of low-Reynolds number wall jet research. The six low-Reynolds k–ε models tested were those developed by Launder and Sharma; Lam and Bremhorst; Abid; Yang and Shih; Abe, Kondoh and Nagano; and Change, Hsieh, and Chen, respectively

MATHEMATICAL MODEL
Simulation details and boundary conditions
Numerical scheme and grid independence study
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call