Abstract
The purpose of this ex vivo study was to compare working time, working length changes and shaping effects using ProTaper, ProFile, FlexMaster and Mtwo rotary instruments. A total of 96 mesiobuccal roots of the first maxillary molars were prepared using these instruments. Using pre and post-radiographs, canal curvature and working length were measured. In addition, the time required for canal preparation was recorded. Data was statistically analysed using one-way anova and Duncan's post-hoc tests. ProTaper significantly lessened the canal curvature (P < 0.001), and Mtwo rotary instruments took significantly less instrumentation time (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the four groups in changing working lengths (P = 0.081). According to the results of the study, the Mtwo rotary instruments required significantly less instrumentation time, and the ProTaper significantly changed the canal curvature.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
